High Quality Nursing Papers by Nursing Experts

Our team of verified nursing experts will please you with excellent quality and timing for your paper

MGMT 321 Aviation/Aerospace Systems Analysis Methods Dataflow Diagram using Visio

Can you help me understand this Computer Science question?

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
MGMT 321 Aviation/Aerospace Systems Analysis Methods Dataflow Diagram using Visio
From $8/Page
Order Essay

Hello,

Here are the instructions for this assignment. Must have Visio to do this assignment. Thanks:

Practical Exercise: Context Diagram

A context diagram is a top-level Data Flow Diagram (DFD) which

presents the logical ‘big picture’ of the information system by defining

how the inventory management system interacts with External Entities.

The Context Diagram shows all the inputs and outputs that flow to and

from the sources and destinations, except for internal Data Stores.

You will utilize the data from the two Casual Format Use Cases that you created in Module 4 to create a Context Diagram.

Please note that despite the term, a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) does not focus on the data that is created, stored, and used in an information system. A Data Flow Diagram (DFD) portrays the processes and activities that the users undergo when utilizing an information system.

You will focus on the data modeling process later in Module 6 when you create Entity Relationship Diagrams (ERDs).

Requirements

Create the Context Diagram utilizing Microsoft Visio®. Before you begin to work on this activity, review the tutorials presented in the Microsoft Project and Microsoft Visio page and the Module 5 Readings and Resources page. These tutorials will help you understand how to create the Context Diagram. Refer to the Context Diagram example in the textbook.

To create the Context Diagram, utilize the Data Flow Model Diagram template located in the Software category in the Visio 2016 application Home page.

Be sure to select the DATA FLOW MODEL DIAGRAM template and NOT the Data Flow Diagram template. The two templates have very similar titles.

Your Context Diagram must address the following requirements:

  • The inventory management system as the single, central Process (Processes are noun-related).
  • A minimum of 3 External Entities (External Entities are noun-related).
  • A minimum of 1 input data flow and 1 output data flow per External Entity (Data Flows are noun-related).
  • Utilize Gane and Sarson symbols.
  • Submit your Context Diagram in VSDX file format.

Note: No Data Stores should be presented in your Context diagram. Data Stores that reside ‘inside’ an information system are not presented in a Context Diagram.

Here is the grading rubic:

MGMT 321 5.2 Practical Exercise Rubric

MGMT 321 5.2 Practical Exercise Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Deliverable Requirements The percentage of the deliverable(s) that meet the assignment’s requirements.

50.0 pts Excellent

The deliverable(s) met ALL of the assignment’s requirements.

45.0 pts Very Good

The deliverable(s) met MOST of the assignment’s requirements.

40.0 pts Satisfactory

The deliverable(s) met MANY of the assignment’s requirements.

35.0 pts Near Failing

The deliverable(s) met SOME of the assignment’s requirements.

0.0 pts Failing

The deliverable(s) did NOT meet ANY of the assignment’s requirements.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Deliverable(s) The overall quality of the deliverable(s) with regard to the composition and detail.

25.0 pts Excellent

The composition and detail of the deliverable(s) was at a VERY HIGH level.

21.0 pts Very Good

The composition and detail of the deliverable(s) was at a HIGH level.

17.0 pts Satisfactory

The composition and detail of the deliverable(s) was at a MODERATE level.

13.0 pts Near Failing

The composition and detail of the deliverable(s) was at a LOW level.

0.0 pts Failing

The composition and detail of the deliverable(s) was at an UNSATISFACTORY level.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Accuracy of the Deliverable(s) The accuracy of the values presented in the deliverable(s).

25.0 pts Excellent

ALL of the data in the deliverable(s) was accurate.

21.0 pts Very Good

MOST of the data in the deliverable(s) was accurate.

17.0 pts Satisfactory

MUCH of the data in the deliverable(s) was accurate.

13.0 pts Near Failing

SOME of the data in the deliverable(s) was accurate.

0.0 pts Failing

NONE of the data in the deliverable(s) was accurate.

25.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0